Talk:Sustainable development

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconVital articles: Level 4 / Society and social sciences C‑class
WikiProject iconSustainable development has been listed as a level-4 vital article in Society. If you can improve it, please do.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Merging "Education for sustainable development (ESD)" with Sustainable development""[edit]

In my opinion,I think "Education for sustainable development (ESD)" should have its own standalone article as it is a broad subject on its own and merging it with "Sustainable development" would not do justice to them. MajorDZod (talk) 09:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi User:MajorDZod , please put your comment here rather: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Education_for_sustainable_development#Merger as per WP:multi (it is not good to have the same discussion on two pages). EMsmile (talk) 10:22, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Update: the merge has been carried out in the meantime. EMsmile (talk) 12:58, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

India Education Program course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.

The above message was substituted from {{IEP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 19:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 19 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Liagabrielafp (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Kayleegmorgan.

— Assignment last updated by Kayleegmorgan (talk) 18:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Recommendation[edit]

This article would have been much better if the article expanded more detailed information about each goal listed in the UN SDG instead of just listing them. The author could have talked about where we are in the process. Also, it would have been better if the author included his/her own perspective on the topic. Also I think the article contains chronological error that it doesn't talk about how sustainable development is currently going on. Sean1084 (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You seem to confuse this article with the one about the SDGs. This one is not about those UN goals. EMsmile (talk) 20:48, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]